A question I often hear when training new clients is: "What cell phone should I buy? What's the best choice for me, among all the options?"

While there is no one universal answer, there is one flavor of phone that has proven to be the best option for productivity, and that is a Windows-based Smartphone. While the make and models vary, the "guts" of these phones are the same. They all run a mobile variation of the familiar Windows operating system. Be aware that each cell phone provider sells a different selection of Windows based Smartphones. In my case, my provider is T-Mobile, and I use a T-Mobile Dash. For other providers there are many excellent options such as a Motorola Q or the Palm 700W serieswindows smartphone. Smartphones make an excellent choice for productivity because they communicate almost flawlessly with Windows based programs, in particular Microsoft Outlook. Since Windows is by far the most universal system in business, the Smartphone is a logical choice. When you connect your Smartphone to a computer, not only does it charge, but all of the contacts, tasks, and calendar items, transfer immediately and effortlessly from your computer to your phone. Because the phone itself is based on a Windows system, the menus are familiar and easy to use. Additionally, for those who prefer to receive their email via phone, Windows Smartphones can handle all your email needs with ease. There are other types of phones that people often ask me about, and I'll explain briefly why I don't find these to be as valuable in terms of productivity. Android (Droid, G1, etc.) Google's Android operating system for mobile devices is Open Source. What does open source mean? Simplified it means  "free to use." Companies like Verizon, Nokia, and HTC don't need to pay Google to install the OS on thier phones. This is a big reason why you are going to see a LOT more Android-based phones in the coming year. Android is very similar to the iPhone in terms of user experience but edges it out slightly in terms of true business productivity. If you are already using Google (a fairly good system) for your calendar,contacts, and  tasks , then this is a no-brainer: get an Android based phone. Blackberry – The Blackberry was the beneficiary of good marketing, and the term Blackberry is often mistakenly used to describe any kind of Smartphone. I would have to say that a Blackberry is a solid second place performer when it comes to productivity. However, it doesn't sync as seamlessly with Outlook, and because the menu features are so different, some people find it difficult to use Blackberries. You may find just a mental switching cost increase because of trying to think about the differences between using a computer and using a Blackberry phone. However, it does handle tasks, contacts, and calendar items fairly well, and I do have a few clients who use them with success. Palm - Without reservation I discourage people from using a Palm-based phone for productivity. First of all, the sync and communication between Palm-based phone and a Windows based computer is poor and unpredictable. This tricky relationship between Palm and Windows is bound to cause lots of problems, and be a tech support nightmare in the long run. Palm does include software for your desktop, but this software is poorly designed and places too many arbitrary limits on how you organize your life. (For example, Palm not allowing a large number of custom categories, something I find is essential for good productivity techniques.) The biggest problem though with a palm is the system itself. Essentially, Palm based phones and planners are using a technology that is over a decade old. It may have been cutting edge in 1996, but now it is slow and it is cumbersome, and I find it difficult for most people to use. iPhone - There is a lot to love about the iPhone, in terms of its visual appeal and its tactile response. It is a beautiful, eye-catching phone that is fairly easy to use. However, iPhone was built primarily for multimedia such a music, videos, and web surfing. Clients I have worked with who have the iPhone bump up against Apple not putting much thought into the productivity tools of contacts, tasks, and calendar. Also, while the iPhone syncs with Mac's iCal program and even Microsoft Entourage, the sync is very questionable and has many missing features that are a frustration for my clients. Trying to sync an iPhone with Microsoft based operating system is even more problematic. iPhone does have one advantage, in that it comes with the "Visual Voicemail" feature, allowing you to read the "gist" of voicemails without having to listen to them. (However, a similar feature can be added to any phone at www.youmail.com.) The bottom line: if you are interested in impressing your friends and watching videos and surfing the Internet with your phone, then the iPhone is a fun choice. If you are interested in using your phone to enhance your productivity and stay on top of all the things that you need to do, the iPhone is limited. Please also watch this video for more information: http://www.davecrenshaw.com/blog/video-training-how-to-avoid-getting-lost-in-translation/ Updated Nov 11, 2009 - Added information about Android - Recommended YouMail instead of CallWave - Added link to video

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.BetterEdit.com Fiona

    Why do you not address the iPhone feature of syncing with Outlook? “While the iPhone syncs with Mac’s iCal program and even Microsoft Entourage, the sync is very questionable and has many missing features that are a frustration for my clients.” Please address the pros and the cons of iPhone’s syncing capacity with Outlook. Thanks.

    • Dave Crenshaw

      Hi Fiona

      “Trying to sync an iPhone with Microsoft based operating system is even more problematic.”

      The cons of the iPhone sync with Outlook are many, including a high likelihood of data loss, corruption (both directions), and in general, lost time trying to figure out how to make it work. The biggest drawback, however, is that the iPhone does not pull over tasks from Outlook. I still have yet to find a third party app that handles the Outlook-to-PC sync well.

      I know you’re an iPhone fan and wouldn’t dare try to talk you out of using it.

      What pros and cons have you found?

      P.S. Bear in mind that this brief article, is geared toward those on the fence or without a lack of knowledge of what the best phone is. Consistently I have seen the most success and least headaches with the Microsoft Outlook to WM smartphone pairing. At this moment, when someone asks for my recommendation, that is what I will recommend.

      • whitney

        I’ve been taking your time management course on lynda.com and now have to get to that task that’s been on my list for months-  figuring out how to sync all my emails, calendar, and tasks on my android galaxy phone. I love the phone, I also love outlook. However it seems that there is no good way to sync these two things without paying someone some more money. I could completely switch to google calendar and the issue would be solved for free, but I would have to give up outlook. the other option seems to be that I could download some app trials, but it would be second part software and I’m concerned about limitations (plus I would eventually have to pay for it). In terms of your time management course, what do you recommend if getting rid of my phone isn’t an option?

        • http://www.DaveCrenshaw.com Dave Crenshaw

          If you stick with a Google phone, then the best option is to go all Google (calendar, contacts, and tasks). If you’re trying to reconcile Google with Outlook, the best sync option is gSyncit, but I can’t recommend that strongly as it has technical issues–as do all third party syncing programs.

          Remember: the principle matters more than the tool. Any tool can work as long as you’re living correct principles.

          P.S. For anyone wondering about what whitney is referring to Re: lynda.com, you can get a free 7 day trial to the course at http://www.DaveCrenshaw.com/free

          • whitney

            Thanks for your reply! I think I will switch to google. at least until they come up with something easier. Our company is small and we’re spread out, so we don’t have a big exchange server or any of the other things that seem to make all of this stuff work together. One thing I wasn’t as happy about with google is the tasks are not as developed as outlook. I don’t think you can set recurring tasks if I remember correctly.

            Really digging the course. Though I am a listmaker, I am the most organized one I know- but i think it slows me down because it becomes like it’s own job keeping up with this list all the time. So, I think it’s really going to help. now if i can just get my husband on board with the inbox idea….

  • http://curtismorley.com Curtis J. Morley

    Dave,

    The new HTC Touch Pro 2 is now available for preview at T-mobile and for purchase on August 12th. It is the most effective/productive WM smart phone available. Sprint will have the same phone in Dec. There is no other phone that even comes close to the productivity of this phone, it’s applications and the user interface.

    Thanks,

    Curtis J. Morley

    • http://video.davecrenshaw.com Dave Crenshaw

      Thanks for the update, Curtis!

      The Touch2 does look very promising. For other readers: don’t confuse it with the MyTouch, which runs Android. (I REALLY like Android as an Operating System but has some syncing issues with Outlook.) They also now have a 3G-based Dash.

      Glad to see T-Mobile is finally getting out of the dark ages in terms of phone selection.

  • http://www.thande.biz Robert

    I have been a real HTC fan for a few years after a lot of research resulted in my purchase of the MOGUL (Sprint). When the underlying Windows OS was updated and the Touch Pro became available I was tempted to make the switch, but I really liked the MOGUL and it’s wheel and buttons. When the Touch Pro 2 was announced I knew I had to have it. The wheel and buttons would not be missed as the Touch Flo overlay to Windows would change the user interface. I have switched to T-Mobile and the Touch Pro 2 and haven’t looked back. It is all I thought it would be and more. Truly the swiss-army knife of smart phones and not just an ipod that makes calls. It really isn’t much different for the Blackberry. For texting and e-mail, it is fine, but then what?

    • http://www.DaveCrenshaw.com Dave Crenshaw

      Thanks for another vote for the HTC Touch Pro 2, Robert. I’m currently in testing mode for the Android based G1, but after I’m done playing with that I’m going to join the Touch Pro 2 party!

  • http://www.thande.biz Robert

    You’re very welcome David and I promise I’m not an HTC employee. I’m still being surprised by features I didn’t even know it had and that’s saying something given the fact that I’m pretty obsessive about researching systems, tools, software, etc.

    Yeah, you knew that Google wouldn’t come out with a dog, but unless it read my mind to empty that collecting point automatically I’m not sure it could pry me away from my Touch Pro 2…

  • http://www.thedebtfreeme.com Gene

    Hi Dave, Connected to you and your book…website..and Myth of Multitasking via Alex Mandsossian blog. I appreciate your Smartphone discussion. Your thoughts on new Verizon Droid?

    Thanks,
    Gene Grass

  • http://www.DaveCrenshaw.com Dave Crenshaw

    @Gene
    Thanks for the note. Alex has been a great supporter! Per your request I just made several updates to this article.

  • http://www.BestComm.Net Roger Harmon

    Great discussion! Our company got into SmartPhones with a WM HTC phone from Sprint, then went to BlackBerry and now have iPhones. The syncing with the iPhone to our Exchange Server is just as good as it was on the two previous platforms. Syncing with a laptop seems to work great for my wife on her iPhone. As far as Tasks syncing, have you tried Evernote? It works across most platforms and goes way beyond MS Tasks.

  • http://www.DaveCrenshaw.com Dave Crenshaw

    Thanks, Roger. I’ve heard good things about Evernote as well as Remember the Milk.

    However, it still seems silly to me that Apple would require its users to get a third party app to handle something as essential as tasks. This is not the most elegant solution.

  • http://looking-at-google-android.wikispaces.com/A+Brief+History+of+Android Leilani Pollet

    I imagine Google some set more emphasis on the apps multi tasking and background processes. I believe they need to establish a broad mechanism for apps to get license to function in background and it should be a user option not the OS. As like how we give permission to apps when installing. But it should be someplace in menu “Enable Running Background: ON/OFF”.